Friday, July 11, 2008

Panic at the Disco - Pretty. Odd.


2008
Fueled By Ramen
Buy (Amazon.com)

6.5/10

The following is a real excerpt of a discussion which transpired on the Dean Koontz Institute for Asemic Writing's Writer's Block Support Line. Names have been changed...kind of.

Support Technician: Dean Koontz Institute's Writer's Block Support, Toni Morrison speaking, how may I help you?

"Pandy" "Missner": Hi, yeah, uh...I've got the block. I've got it bad.

ST: Can you be more specific, sir? What is it exactly that you're trying to write?

PM: Well, I'm trying to write a review of Panic! At The Disco's new record, Pretty. Odd., and I seem t--

ST: New? Didn't that album come out in, like, March? What the hell are you doing reviewing it now?

PM: Uh, I--

ST: And by the way, that's Panic at the Disco now, they dropped the exclamation mark awhile back.

PM: Wait, how did you know I added an exclamation mark? We're on the phone!

ST: Willful suspension of disbelief, sir.

PM: Okay...

ST: So, why don't you read me what you have so far?

PM: Not much at all: "A disappointing follow-up to what was a very interesting, albeit repetitive debut."

ST: That's a start. Well, more of an end, really; I think that would make a great conclusion. In the interim, you could mention the fact that while Panic will always be looked down upon as "sell outs" in some circles, Pretty. Odd. demonstrates a move in the opposite direction, with the --

PM: --the longer, more ambitious songs, and less easily identifiable hooks. Precisely! For example, Do You Know What I'm Seeing? is catchy to an extent, but - and I never thought I'd ever use the words "subtle" and "Panic at the Disco" in the same sentence - it might be too sublte for its own good. This is pop music I'm listening to: I want catchy, I want infectious, I want hooks, God damn it!

ST: It sounds like you have plenty to say, I don't think you need my assistance...

PM: But I do. I do!

ST: Clingy doesn't suit you well, so I'd suggest you stop. Why don't you put on that air of feigned indifference that you indie snobs are so practiced at?

PM: Hey! I take offense at that. I think somebody can enjoy independent music but still have an open mind for the more popular varieties as well. Why do you think that I listen to Panic in the first place? But it's funny you should mention snobbery, as I wanted to bring up just how pretentious Brendon Urie seems on album opener We're So Starving.

ST: How so?

PM: Imagine if I started off a review like this:

Oh, how it's been so long.
I'm so sorry I've been gone.
I was busy writing reviews for...you!
You don't have to worry 'cause I'm still the same budding music journalist!


ST: That's a terrible idea. Why would you ever start a review like that? You're right, you do need my help!

PM: But don't you get it? Change "reviews" to "songs", "budding music journalist" to "band", fix the pronouns, and stack enough vocal harmonies on top of eachother to give Brian Wilson a brain aneurysm: it's the opening track.

ST: Oh wow, I see what you mean. Instead of giving the fans reassurance, I think it might achieve the opposite effect: disorientation.

PM: Or worse, disenchantment!

ST: Have you ever considered that it's intended to be a bit tongue-in-cheek?

PM: Well yeah, it crossed my mind. I mean the band can be pretty clever, so I wouldn't put it past them, but it rubbed me the wrong way nonetheless.

ST: Fair enough. It sounds like you have plenty to write a review, but you're almost out of time. In 90 seconds this call will no longer be toll-free, and instead cost $4.00 per minute or fraction thereof, so I'd suggest you wrap it up. Anything you'd like to add before you go?

PM: No, not really, except that whenever I hear the single Nine In The Afternoon, those opening notes on the piano really throw me for a loop. I always think that I'm listening to Wishbone by Architecture In Helsinki!

ST: Architecture in who, now?

PM: Eh, nevermind...Thanks for all your help, it's been great. Oh! And one more question: I was considering just publishing this as the review. What are your thoughts on that?

ST: What do you mean by "this"?

PM: You know, the transcript of this conversation, kinda like a concept review of sorts.

ST: I think Brent DiCrescenzo beat that horse to death awhile back...and frankly he did it better here and here and here and here, and of course here.

PM: Brent who, now? And I can't click those links, I told you, we're on the telephone!

ST: Eh, nevermind...I'm sorry, the toll-free period has elapsed. Your credit card will now be char--

PM: *click*

***

The review proper

A disappointing follow-up to what was a very interesting, albeit repetitive debut.

(Click to download)


5 comments:

  1. Please support our effort to re-unite P!ATD! by visiting our blog, Twelveteendays.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why did the group drop the exclamation mark?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for sharing very important information onthe lost art of found sound.really i got great information here........
    Panic At The Disco

    ReplyDelete